tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30605323.post115591533537681405..comments2007-02-18T17:01:33.161ZChris Castlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09652154277551773055noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30605323.post-34235163868382306722007-02-18T17:01:33.161Z2007-02-18T17:01:33.161Z

The logical fallacies in this post are so deep that I wish I had time to really spell them out, but here's a few thoughts.<BR/><BR/>1. GPL: You're right, I don't have a problem with the GPL because people who use the GPL do so voluntarily. Voluntarily. The Pirate Party is not about voluntary action, it's about stealing things, hence "Pirate". Your point is...what, exactly?<BR/><BR/>2. The

Chris Castlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09652154277551773055noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30605323.post-1156810978623549532006-08-29T00:22:00.000Z2006-08-29T00:22:00.000Z

hmmm...This is basically a long rant, which just shows that you really do hate the Pirate Party, and are totally blind to the wrongs perpetuated by the advocates of alternative 'Intellectual Property' Regimes.<BR/><BR/>First, a substantial part of the commons movement depends on enforcable 'IP' laws.<BR/><BR/>In particular, the GPL, the most widely used license, could not work without copyright.

enigma_foundryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00641585541816299577noreply@blogger.com